Dr. Phil is not a psychologist, but he does play one on TV
Dr. Phil performs “therapy” for entertainment purposes only.
Dr. Phil is an ENTERTAINER, not a therapist.
- Dr. Phil is a Doctor. He has a Ph.D. in Psychology.
- Dr. Phil is not a psychologist. He is not licensed as a psychologist.
- Dr. Phil used to be a psychologist. He used to be licensed.
- He cannot practice psychology, and what he does is not actually the practice of psychology.
- Yes, he can call him self Dr. Phil.
Source: Paul G. Mattiuzzi, Ph.D.
Read more about “Is Dr. Phil actually a psychologist?” by Paul G. Mattiuzzi, Ph.D. at this link.
The following clip was published by the Dr. Phil Show on Thursday, July 27, 2017.
Watch the clip and ask yourself if this seems like legitimate therapy to you.
Here is the blurb posted below this clip on YouTube written by the Dr. Phil Show:
Tom and Karen claim their oldest daughter, Madison, drinks, smokes weed, steals, is violent, and a bad influence on her 13-year-old sister, Liz. Madison says she would “do anything” not to be living at home, but when the 15-year-old is informed she’s been enrolled in a residential program for women and teens, she rejects the idea saying, “You’re sending me away…as if sending me away is going to help?” Watch to the very end to find out what Madison does, when Tom says they’re committed to getting her help.
Dr. Phil uses the power of television to tell compelling stories about real people.
The Dr. Phil show provides the most comprehensive forum on mental health issues in the history of television. For over a decade, Dr. McGraw has used the show’s platform to make psychology accessible and understandable to the general public by addressing important personal and social issues. Using his top-rated show as a teaching tool, he takes aim at the critical issues of our time, including the “silent epidemics” of bullying, drug abuse, domestic violence, depression, child abuse, suicide and various forms of severe mental illness.
Notice the YouTube category is ENTERTAINMENT. Also notice, disclaimers (aka the small print) shown at the end of his show that reiterates that this show is for entertainment purposes only.
This poor family is in crisis and needs legitimate advice from a licensed family therapist, not a “Television Therapist” that participates in dispensing pseudo-psychology as therapy, despite the fact that he should know better with his educational background being in psychology.
There are no scientific studies and no evidence that support the legitimacy of the types of programs that Dr. Phil recommends.
However, I have seen in the credits of the Dr. Phil’s show that these programs advertise, in other words, sponsor the Dr. Phil show. So yes, Dr. Phil gets kickbacks for recommending these programs to desperate families and obviously has no problem doing so without any regards as to whether or not they are harmful or helpful.
I take huge issue with the paragraph that Dr. McGraw has used the show’s platform to make psychology accessible and understandable to the general public by addressing important personal and social issues. Instead, he has made the science of psychology even confusing to the general public by presenting himself as a legitimate therapist, which he is not, and by promoting pseudo psychology which is NOT legitimate, evidence-based psychology.
The show’s writers state that Dr. Phil uses his top-rated show as a teaching tool, he takes aim at the critical issues of our time, including the “silent epidemics” of bullying, drug abuse, domestic violence, depression, child abuse, suicide and various forms of severe mental illness. I don’t understand how he can allow this to be written about his show when he is well aware of the fact that he is teaching false psychological approaches to therapy, he uses bullying tactics to get these parents to enroll their daughter in this program in which he knows there is a possibility that these programs could possibly cause a client to become more depressed, to eventually partake in drug abuse or be abused by these unregulated, unsupervised businesses claiming to be therapeutic programs.
Maybe Dr. Phil isn’t aware of the dangers of these programs.
NOPE! This is not the case. Even if this was the case, it seems the responsible thing for him to do would be to have his staff do some research on these programs.
But the fact is that this issue has been brought to his attention. In fact, there was a Dr. Phil show called “Children Sent Away: Trapped and Tortured?” See the clip and read more about it here. Find one paragraph taken from that page:
Dr. Phil’s guests say the residential treatment centers they encountered as troubled teens did more harm than good. Marianne says she was abused at a therapeutic boarding school — and that her mom, Tami, did nothing to stop it. The two come face to face for the first time in five years. Can they call a truce and work on rebuilding their relationship? And, Nick and Theresa say they felt trapped and tortured at the residential treatment program where their mom, Leslie, sent them. Can these siblings find forgiveness?
That was from 2013, yet here he is four years later still promoting the “services” of these so-called therapeutic businesses.
The Dr. Phil Show does not allow comments on videos about these programs because they know there will be many of them who disagree with them. Wouldn’t a legitimate, ethical therapist want the general public to become aware of both positive and negative opinions about the programs he suggests?
Lastly, why doesn’t the American Psychological Association (APA) speak out about this television show that is doing so much to delegitimize the real science of psychology?
I would love to hear from someone who is a member of the APA address this.
I would also like to hear all thoughts and comments about this issue, to get both positive and negative opinions in the public eye.
More about NON-EVIDENCE-BASED PSYCHOLOGY
“Therapy” for Entertainment = Pseudo-psychology (not to mention unethical)
What is Pseudopsychology?